The U. S. Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a memo dated January 4, 2018 regarding federal marijuana enforcement policy, directing all U.S. Attorneys to enforce the laws enacted by Congress and to follow well-established principles when pursuing prosecutions related to marijuana activities.  Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ memorandum rescinds multiple guidance documents issued during the Obama administration, such as the Cole Memo  dated August 29, 2013, and announces a” return to the rule of law.”  Continue Reading Sessions Memo Resets Federal Marijuana Enforcement Policy


The Massachusetts Department of Public Health (DPH) has provided a much anticipated pathway to enable for-profit entities to operate Registered Marijuana Dispensaries (RMDs).  DPH’s Medical Use of Marijuana Program (the “RMD Program”) has released Guidance for Registered Marijuana Dispensaries Regarding Corporate Conversion, pursuant to Section 72 of An Act to Ensure Safe Access to Marijuana (Chapter 55 of the Acts of 2017, or the “2017 Act”), which enables non-profit entities with a Provisional or Final Certificate of Registration to operate a RMD, or current applicants, to convert to a for-profit Massachusetts domestic corporate entity.  Continue Reading Massachusetts DPH Clears the Air for For-Profit Conversion of Medical Marijuana Dispensaries

The Massachusetts legislature has targeted July 1, 2017 as the date by which it will have legislation on Governor Charlie Baker’s desk regarding the commercial cultivation, processing, and sale of non-medicinal cannabis products for adult use. On June 23rd, the House and Senate each appointed members to a 6-member conference committee that is tasked with resolving the differences between the (renumbered) House and Senate bills, H.3776 and S.2097. There are a number of differences to be addressed, including taxation, enforcement, and the ability of communities to limit or prohibit the establishment of cannabis businesses, even when a community has allowed a registered medical marijuana dispensary. ML Strategies has issued a Client Alert summarizing the progress of this issue from passage of the November 16, 2016 ballot question establishing “recreational” production and sale of cannabis products, through this most recent legislative activity. Stay tuned for further coverage.

Written by: Dianne Bourque and M. Daria Niewenhous

The Massachusetts Department of Public Health Public Health Council approved, by unanimous vote, final regulations for the implementation of the medical marijuana ballot initiative law that will allow qualifying patients with certain medical conditions to obtain and use marijuana for medicinal purposes. Approved on May 8, the final regulations provide an implementation framework for the new law and, among other things:

  • define debilitating medical conditions for which the use of medical marijuana is authorized;
  • define the maximum 60-day supply that a patient may legally posses (10 ounces of finished leaf product);
  • define the bone fide physician patient relationship required for a physician to certify a patient for medical marijuana use.  The regulations also prohibit a physician from certifying immediate family members;
  • adopt a framework for municipal involvement and oversight in regulating medical marijuana, provided that local regulations do not conflict with state law; and
  • revise
    the requirement that Registered Marijuana Dispensary (RMD) applicants maintain $500,000 in an escrow account to demonstrate financial viability and instead require applicants to demonstrate at least $500,000 of liquid capital available for the first RMD location, and $400,000 for additional locations under common ownership.

Although “Medical Marijuana Treatment Center” (MMTC) was the term given to these entities under the law, the Council amended the regulatory definitions to provide that MMTCs will be known as “Registered Marijuana Dispensaries” or “RMDs.”  The Council believes that this better reflects the nature of the activities taking place at these locations, which do not provide on site clinical treatment services.

The final regulations also provide that they shall not be construed to limit the scope of practice of a nurse practitioner pursuant to M.G.L. c. 112, s. 80I.  Added by Chapter 224 of the Acts of 2012 (effective November 4, 2012), Section 80I provides that, when a law or rule requires a certification by a physician, when relating to physical or mental health, that requirement may be fulfilled by a nurse practitioner.  However, Section 80I also states that it is not to be construed to expand the scope of practice of nurse practitioners. At its May 8 meeting, at least one Public Health Council member noted that the regulations, which also require that a physician have a bona fide physician patient relationship to certify that a patient qualifies to obtain marijuana for medical use, seemed unclear as to whether or not nurse practitioners can provide this certification.  DPH staff responded that its intent is to leave it to the Board of Registration in Nursing, which licenses nurse practitioners, to determine if certifying patients for medical marijuana registration is within a nurse practitioner’s scope of practice.  DPH expects the Board will take up this issue quickly.

Despite the passage of final regulations, it will be several months before RMDs are open in the state.  We will be posting additional analyses of the regulations, including information regarding the RMD application and approval process, in the coming weeks.  Meanwhile, additional information, including Medical Marijuana FAQs, and the Department of Public Health Medical Marijuana Working Group’s Memorandum to the Public Health Council can be found at the Executive Office of Health and Human Services Medical Marijuana Page.