{"id":4436,"date":"2017-03-31T23:47:00","date_gmt":"2017-03-31T23:47:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.healthlawpolicymatters.com\/?p=4436"},"modified":"2021-11-02T23:50:45","modified_gmt":"2021-11-02T23:50:45","slug":"states-continue-trend-to-reduce-telemedicine-barriers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.healthlawpolicymatters.com\/2017\/03\/31\/states-continue-trend-to-reduce-telemedicine-barriers\/","title":{"rendered":"States Continue Trend to Reduce Telemedicine Barriers"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

In 2016 and now in early 2017, state legislatures and regulatory boards continue to enact laws and rules setting telemedicine practice standards. Such standards generally include clarifying the definition of telemedicine as well as providing standards related to prescribing in an online setting, patient informed consent, treatment of medical records generated during a telemedicine encounter, and confidentiality. A recent\u00a0survey<\/a>\u00a0conducted by the\u00a0Federation of State Medical Boards<\/a>\u00a0(FSMB) found that telemedicine standards are the number one priority for state medical boards going into 2017.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Unlike prior years where state legislatures would enact general telemedicine practice standards and allow state medical or other regulatory boards to issue detailed standards, in 2016 and early 2017, we have observed an unprecedented number of state legislatures enacting detailed telemedicine statutes. For example, state legislatures have passed laws establishing detailed telemedicine standards in\u00a0Alaska<\/a>,\u00a0Arkansas<\/a>,\u00a0Indiana<\/a>,\u00a0Louisiana<\/a>,\u00a0Michigan<\/a>,\u00a0Missouri<\/a>,\u00a0South Carolina<\/a>, and\u00a0West Virginia<\/a>. Many of these states boards of medicine either had no standards governing telemedicine or fairly restrictive standards. By passing such laws, the state legislatures have put pressure on state boards of medicine to either issue new rules or amend existing rules to comply with these newly passed telemedicine standards. This is an important development and signals that state lawmakers are prepared to embrace telemedicine as a safe and cost-effective way to provide medical services to patients, even if state regulatory boards are not.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nowhere has the struggle between state lawmakers and boards of medicine on telemedicine standards been more evident than in Texas. Earlier this month,\u00a0Texas lawmakers introduced a bill (S.B. 1107<\/a>) that would enable clinicians in the state to use telemedicine to establish a physician-patient relationship. The bill specifically eliminates the requirement that physicians conduct a face-to-face meeting with a patient before using telemedicine for certain services, such as issuing a prescription.\u00a0 The bill would allow physicians to establish a relationship with a new patient through a virtual visit involving an audio-video telecommunications platform or through\u00a0a combination of store-and-forward technology and a phone call if the physician has had prior access to the patient\u2019s medical records. The proposed legislation is in response to the 2015 Texas Medical Board emergency\u00a0proposed rule<\/a>. Under the proposed rule, physicians must perform a face-to-face or in-person physical examination of a patient prior to issuing a prescription or risk sanctions for unprofessional conduct. The proposed rule drew\u00a0sharp criticism<\/a>\u00a0from telemedicine providers and, since April 2015, the Medical Board has been\u00a0embroiled<\/a>\u00a0in a lawsuit with Teladoc, a Dallas-based telehealth provider that does a majority of its business via phone. Both sides have asked for and received a\u00a0stay<\/a>\u00a0in the litigation until April in hopes that new legislation will solve the dispute.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The fact that state legislatures and regulatory boards are issuing detailed telemedicine standards is good news for the telemedicine industry. Detailed standards decrease the uncertainty of state laws in this area and pave the way for providers to tailor their telemedicine programs to fit within state laws. As providers and consumers continue to use technology to provide and receive health care, state lawmakers will almost certainly continue to adopt and amend state laws with an eye towards decreasing telemedicine barriers.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In 2016 and now in early 2017, state legislatures and regulatory boards continue to enact laws and rules setting telemedicine practice standards. Such standards generally include clarifying the definition of telemedicine as well as providing standards related to prescribing in an online setting, patient informed consent, treatment of medical records generated during a telemedicine encounter, … Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_generate-full-width-content":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.healthlawpolicymatters.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4436"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.healthlawpolicymatters.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.healthlawpolicymatters.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.healthlawpolicymatters.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.healthlawpolicymatters.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4436"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.healthlawpolicymatters.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4436\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4437,"href":"https:\/\/www.healthlawpolicymatters.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4436\/revisions\/4437"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.healthlawpolicymatters.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4436"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.healthlawpolicymatters.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4436"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.healthlawpolicymatters.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4436"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}